The Portfolio will be graded based on the following criteria. Check to be sure that all requirements are fulfilled:
A= 21-24 points
B= 17-20 points
C=
13-16 points
D= 7-12 points
F= 0 - 6
points
TOPIC |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
I. Main Page |
INDEX.HTML CSS Style Sheet. Background. Link Style Sheet. 2 DIVISIONS. Hyperlink w/ picture and text. Mouse hovering, Coloring effects. Navigation Bar in place. You Must have the following Picture and Nav Bar Links:
|
Missing 1 element. Good page Layout,
a few objects are not quite centered. |
Missing 2 elements Page Layout not
balanced but most of the requirement is present. |
Missing 3 or more
elements Poor Layout |
II. COVER LETTER |
Cover letter 3 paragraphs Professionally written Resume complete Cover-resume link Spelling/ grammar |
Cover letter 2 paragraphs Resume Minimal grammar
errors Links in place |
Cover letter
weakly written. Resume sparsely
done. Multiple grammar
errors. Links attempted
but not functional. |
Missing Cover or
Resume. Links not working. Documents
not logically written. |
III. CONTACT FORM |
Submission form link. Text input fields Drop down options. Option boxes. E-mail submit button. Background & Layout are eye catching. |
All Options attempted,
form has eye appeal. 1-2 options not
functioning properly. |
Several Missing
Options. Link and
background in tact. |
Form is poorly
written. Links are not functioning. Background
not operational. |
IV. FINANCE PAGE |
Financial page link. Developed financial concept. (revenue, savings, planned savings) Supports claims made in presentation. Cell formatting shading enhances the page. Proper use of formulas. Chart / graph clearly define success. |
Good presentation
effect. Chart supports argument. Small errors in formula or minimal spelling
errors. Good visual
display. |
All elements are
displayed, but Chart does not support any claim. Errors in
Formula. Poor choice of graph type to
prove claim. Poorly labeled graph. Shading/ Color not effective. |
Chart or Graph
missing. Multiple errors in
chart. Doesn’t support any claim. Shading/ Color
distracts from readability. |
V. PERSONAL PAGE |
Excellent use of Pictures, Sound and animation to enhance presentation. Adds Value to the Oral Presentation and appeal of the presenter. |
Pictures, Sound
are used, but to lesser effect. Doesn’t hurt
presentation, but doesn’t help either. |
Attempt is made to
implement media solution, but doesn’t help “sell” the candidate. |
Little effort
made. Harms presenter’s professional
objective. |
VI. ORAL
PRESENTATION |
Confident,
Professional Presentation. Uses Portfolio to
enhance speaking. Makes use of
specific examples. Answers Questions
effectively. Summarizes well. |
Steady
presentation. References portfolio
well, but stumbles once or twice. Answers a few
questions, but is silenced once or twice. |
Candidate attempts
to work through nervous presentation by referencing a few points. Has
difficulty with a few questions. |
Very weak,
inaudible presentation. Candidate doesn’t
use Portfolio as reference. Stumbles
on many questions. |